Mathematical Models for Contraceptive Use : A Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study reviews the development of quantitative approaches used to analyse contraceptive use, with a particular emphasis on mathematical and statistical modelling studies published between 2019 and April 2024. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework, combined with bibliometric analysis. Articles were retrieved from the Scopus and ScienceDirect databases using combinations of keywords related to contraceptive use and modelling approaches. The initial search identified 2,494 articles, which were filtered based on publication year, document type, language, and relevance to the research topic. After screening titles, abstracts, and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 62 articles were selected for final analysis. Bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer was conducted to identify keyword co-occurrence and co-authorship networks among researchers. The results indicate that research on contraceptive use has increased steadily during the study period and that various quantitative modelling approaches have been applied to analyse contraceptive dynamics across different countries. Quantitative approaches used in the reviewed studies include logistic regression, multilevel models, spatial analysis, Bayesian methods, time-series models, machine learning, artificial neural networks, and several mathematical population models. These approaches are widely used to examine determinants of contraceptive use, including socio-demographic and spatial factors influencing contraceptive adoption. Bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer identified six keyword clusters with 3,636 links and four author collaboration clusters with 66 links, indicating strong thematic relationships and growing research collaboration in this field. Overall, the findings highlight the increasing role of quantitative modeling approaches in understanding contraceptive dynamics and identifying factors influencing contraceptive use.
Article Details
References
[1] S. Kumar et al., “Chenopodium album seed extract: a potent sperm-immobilizing agent both in vitro and in vivo,” Contraception, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.015.
[2] S. Ontiri, V. Were, M. Kabue, R. Biesma-Blanco, and J. Stekelenburg, “Patterns and determinants of modern contraceptive discontinuation among women of reproductive age: Analysis of Kenya Demographic Health Surveys, 2003-2014,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 11 November, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241605.
[3] S. Ahmed, Q. Li, L. Liu, and A. O. Tsui, “Maternal deaths averted by contraceptive use: An analysis of 172 countries,” Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9837, pp. 111–125, 2012, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60478-4.
[4] S. Sangar, “Bringing a women’s perspective to family planning,” Curr. Sci., vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 633–637, 2018, doi: 10.18520/cs/v115/i4/633-637.
[5] G. H. Djatmika and A. Hendriyana, “Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Keluarga Berencana Pada Badan Kependudukan Keluarga Berencana Daerah,” Ilmu Ekon. Manaj. dan Akunt., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–93, 2020, doi: 10.37012/ileka.v1i1.400.
[6] T. Petruney, L. C. Wilson, J. Stanback, and W. Cates, “Family planning and the post-2015 development agenda,” Bull. World Health Organ., vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 359–360, 2014, doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.142893.
[7] J. Jaiswal, S. Naik, R. Rangari, and A. Sinha, “Awareness and acceptance of various contraceptive methods among postpartum women in a tertiary care center,” Int. J. Reprod. Contraception, Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1352, 2021, doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210996.
[8] S. N. Dwivedi and K. R. Sundaram, “Epidemiological models and related simulation results for understanding of contraceptive adoption in India,” Int. J. Epidemiol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2000, doi: 10.1093/ije/29.2.300.
[9] T. Ferede, “Multilevel modelling of modern contraceptive use among rural and urban population of Ethiopia,” Am J Math Stat, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2013.
[10] D. J. Makupe, S. Kumwenda, and L. Kazembe, “An application of mixed-effect models to analyse contraceptive use in Malawian women,” Contracept. Reprod. Med., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40834-019-0088-y.
[11] N. A. Samat, N. A. M. Sapri, N. C. Him, A. Mahmud, and N. W. M. Junus, “Socio Demographic Determinants of Contraceptive Use Among Women in Malaysia: Logistic Regression Model,” in Springer Proceedings in Physics, 2022, pp. 279–288. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-8903-1_26.
[12] D. K. Irawaty and H. Pratomo, “Socio-demographic characteristics of male contraceptive use in Indonesia,” Malaysian J. Public Heal. Med., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 152–157, 2019.
[13] M. M. Azanaw, D. T. Fentie, Y. A. Bukayaw, A. M. Lakew, and M. M. Sisay, “Spatial distribution and determinant factors of unmet need for family planning among all reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: a multi-level logistic regression modelling approach,” Contracept. Reprod. Med., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40834-022-00178-9.
[14] B. H. Lange, “Sustainability in Media,” SMPTE Motion Imaging J., vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 7–9, 2023, doi: 10.5594/JMI.2023.3285270.
[15] P. Hallinger and V. T. Nguyen, “Mapping the landscape and structure of research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12051947.
[16] M. Tang, H. Liao, Z. Wan, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. A. Rosen, “Ten years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A bibliometric overview,” Sustain., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1–21, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10051655.
[17] A. Ninkov, J. R. Frank, and L. A. Maggio, “Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing,” Perspect. Med. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 173–176, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4.
[18] R. G. Roni, H. Tsipi, B. A. Ofir, S. Nir, and K. Robert, “Disease evolution and risk-based disease trajectories in congestive heart failure patients,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 125, no. November 2021, p. 103949, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103949.
[19] H. Sharma, S. K. Singh, and S. Srivastava, “Spatial heterogeneity and major correlates of Unmet Need of family planning among young married women aged 15-24 in India: An Exploratory Study,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211024615.
[20] P. Anglewicz, D. Sarnak, A. Gemmill, and S. Becker, “Characteristics Associated with Reliability in Reporting of Contraceptive Use: Assessing the Reliability of the Contraceptive Calendar in Seven Countries,” Stud. Fam. Plann., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 17–38, 2023, doi: 10.1111/sifp.12226.
[21] G. Odwe, Y. D. Wado, F. Obare, K. Machiyama, and J. Cleland, “Method-specific beliefs and subsequent contraceptive method choice: Results from a longitudinal study in urban and rural Kenya,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 6 June, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252977.
[22] M. B. Asresie, G. A. Fekadu, and G. W. Dagnew, “Contraceptive use among women with no fertility intention in Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 6 June, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234474.
[23] D. Thindwa et al., “Correction: Pregnancy intention and contraceptive use among HIV-positive Malawian women at 4-26 weeks post-partum: A nested cross-sectional study (PLoS ONE (2019) 14: 4 (e0215947) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215947),” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 23–32, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217330.
[24] U. Munuo and F. V. Moshi, “Assessing motivators for utilizing family planning services among youth students in higher learning institutions in Dodoma, Tanzania: Protocol for analytical cross sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 3 March, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282249.
[25] C. Krug, F. L. Cavallar, K. L. M. Wong, A. Gasparrini, A. Faye, and C. A. Lync, “Evaluation of Senegal supply chain intervention on contraceptive stockouts using routine stock data,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 8 August, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236659.
[26] D. A. Akoku, T. A. Vukugah, M. A. Tihnje, and I. B. Nzubepie, “Childbearing intentions, fertility awareness knowledge and contraceptive use among female university students in Cameroon,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 10 October, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276270.
[27] A. J. Gage, F. E. Wood, and P. Z. Akilimali, “Perceived norms, personal agency, and postpartum family planning intentions among first-time mothers age 15–24 years in Kinshasa: A cross-sectional analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7 July, pp. 1–24, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254085.
[28] N. A. Zaen, “The Relationship Between Age, Education Level, and Residential Area Towards Contraceptive Use in Married Woman in Indonesia,” J. BIOMETRIKA DAN Kependud. ( J. Biometrics Popul. ) Relatsh. BETWEEN AGE , Educ. Lev. , Resid. AREA Towar. Contracept. USE MARRIED, vol. 11, no. July, pp. 1–10, 2022.
[29] Y. Pan and Y. Liu, “Economics of Education Review Birth control , family size and educational stratification : Evidence from the Han and ethnic minorities in China ☆,” vol. 81, no. March 2020, pp. 1–10, 2021.
[30] N. Roy et al., “Prevalence and factors associated with family planning during COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 9 September, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257634.
[31] D. K. Guilkey and I. S. Speizer, “The direct and indirect effects of community beliefs and attitudes on postpartum contraceptive method choice among young women ages 15-24 in Nigeria,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 1 January, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261701.
[32] K. M. Beyene, S. A. Bekele, and M. K. Abu, “Factors affecting utilization of modern contraceptive methods among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 11 November, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294444.
[33] M. A. Kibret and L. T. Gebremedhin, “Two decades of family planning in Ethiopia and the way forward to sustain hard ‑ fought gains !,” Reprod. Health, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01435-5.
[34] S. H. Nyarko, “Spatial variations and socioeconomic determinants of modern contraceptive use in Ghana: A Bayesian multilevel analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230139.
[35] B. A. Ejigu et al., “Spatial analysis of modern contraceptive use among women who need it in Ethiopia: Using geo-referenced data from performance monitoring for action,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 4 April, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297818.
[36] L. A. Zimmerman, S. O. Bell, Q. Li, A. Morzenti, P. Anglewicz, and A. O. Tsui, “Individual, community and service environment factors associated with modern contraceptive use in five Sub-Saharan African countries: A multilevel, multinomial analysis using geographically linked data from PMA2020,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1–21, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218157.
[37] E. Arlotti-Parish, C. Ajema, L. Mutea, and S. Ontiri, “Determinants of Contraceptive Use among Unmarried Young Women in Kakamega County, Kenya,” Adolescents, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 382–393, 2023, doi: 10.3390/adolescents3030026.
[38] S. Lahiri, J. Bingenheimer, E. Sedlander, W. Munar, and R. Rimal, “The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 2 February, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275824.
[39] G. O. Babore and A. Z. Heliso, “Contraceptive utilization and associated factors among youths in Hossana town administrative, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 11 November, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275124.
[40] V. Kantorova, “Contraceptive use and needs among adolescent women aged 15-19: Regional and global estimates and projections from 1990 to 2030 from a Bayesian hierarchical modelling study,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 3 March, pp. 1–28, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247479.
[41] D. A. Bitew, “Predictors of underage pregnancy among women aged 15–19 in highly prevalent regions of Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis based on EDHS, 2016,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27805-y.
[42] T. O. Michael, T. F. Ojo, O. A. Ijabadeniyi, M. A. Ibikunle, J. O. Oni, and A. A. Agboola, “Prevalence and factors associated with contraceptive use among sexually active adolescent girls in 25 sub-Saharan African countries,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 2 February, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297411.
[43] A. Habte, A. Tamene, and B. Bogale, “Women empowerment domains and unmet need for contraception among married and cohabiting fecund women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis based on gender role framework,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 9 September, pp. 1–26, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291110.
[44] A. B. Teshale, “Factors associated with unmet need for family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel multinomial logistic regression analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263885.
[45] A. A. Emiru, G. D. Alene, and G. T. Debelew, “The role of maternal health care services as predictors of time to modern contraceptive use after childbirth in Northwest Ethiopia: Application of the shared frailty survival analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228678.
[46] A. Pattnaik et al., “The aggregate effect of implementation strength of family planning programs on modern contraceptive use at the health systems level in rural Malawi,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 11 November, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232504.
[47] M. Biswas and A. Banerjee, “Examining the linkages between maternity services and postpartum modern contraceptive adoption among young women in India: Insights from the 2015-16 and 2019-21 National Family Health Survey,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 8 August, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289701.
[48] N. Kebede, “A multivariate decomposition analysis of modern contraceptive utilization among married women in the emerging region of Ethiopia (2000–2019),” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48176-4.
[49] R. Karim, M. A. Bkar Pk, M. Asaduzzaman, P. Dey, and M. A. Akbar, “Investigation on Predicting Family Planning and Women’S and Children’S Health Effects on Bangladesh By Conducting Age Structure Population Model,” J. Mech. Contin. Math. Sci., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 65–86, 2024, doi: 10.26782/jmcms.2024.03.00005.
[50] T. Colbourn et al., “Modeling Contraception and Pregnancy in Malawi: A Thanzi La Onse Mathematical Modeling Study,” Stud. Fam. Plann., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 585–607, 2023, doi: 10.1111/sifp.12255.
[51] S. Gedfie, S. Getawa, W. Kassahun, K. T. Gashaye, and M. Melku, “Hematological parameters of reproductiveage women using hormonal contraceptives at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 11 November, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277254.
[52] P. Singh, “Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992-2016): A multilevel study,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246530.
[53] N. G. Gejo, A. A. Anshebo, and L. H. Dinsa, “Postpartum modern contraceptive use and associated factors in Hossana town,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217167.
[54] P. Anglewicz et al., “Service delivery point and individual characteristics associated with the adoption of modern contraceptive: A multi-country longitudinal analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 8 August, pp. 1–17, 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254775.
[55] F. T. Fantaye and S. A. Damtew, “Women decision making on use of modern family planning methods and associated factors, evidence from PMA Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 2 Febuary, pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298516.
[56] S. Babazadeh, P. Anglewicz, J. M. Wisniewsk, P. K. Kayemb, J. Hernandez, and J. T. Bertran, “The influence of health facility-level access measures on modern contraceptive use in Kinshasa, DRC,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 7 July, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236018.